By Lena Marchetti
WASHINGTON — A U.S.-brokered ceasefire in one flooded, front-line Ukrainian town is set to take effect before dawn on Tuesday. Russian, Ukrainian and American negotiators are expected to meet in early November for the first three-way talks since February. And a Malta-flagged tanker carrying about 40,000 metric tons of Russian diesel is crossing the Atlantic toward New York.
These three developments from the past week are connected. Together they show the bargain the Trump administration is now testing: small, verifiable humanitarian steps on the ground, a return to formal negotiations, and a deliberate easing of the economic pressure Congress voted to impose on Moscow only five weeks ago.
A review of the documents behind each step shows a path that is narrow, still reversible, and dependent on decisions in Washington and Moscow that have not yet been made. These include a White House statement, a Kremlin readout, an executive order published in the Federal Register, and public statements from Kyiv.
A ceasefire the size of one town
The smallest piece came first. In a statement released Oct. 23, the White House said both governments had agreed to a pause in fighting limited to Oleshky. The Russian-occupied town sits on the left bank of the Dnipro River in the Kherson region.
“Both nations agreed to temporarily stop all military action in Oleshky to allow for humanitarian aid to enter and to prepare a civilian evacuation through a designated safe passageway,” the White House said.
The arrangement was credited to Melania Trump, whose office has previously worked with both governments on the return of displaced children. The White House said those six earlier efforts reunited 34 children with their families.
“Oleshky is a front-line war city on the brink of disaster,” Mrs. Trump said in the statement. She added that “Oleshky’s remaining population is comprised primarily of elderly residents who urgently need medical attention, medicine, food and clean water.”
According to the White House, the town had about 24,000 residents before the full-scale invasion and has between 1,700 and 2,000 now, including about 50 children. About 90 percent of it was flooded after the Kakhovka dam was destroyed in June 2023. The statement said civilian leaders from both countries, not military officers, would work together to visit residents. It also said an “impartial American media organization” would be allowed to document the effort.
Moscow confirmed the timing. Russia’s chief of the general staff, Gen. Valery Gerasimov, said on the Defense Ministry’s Telegram channel that the halt would begin at 4 a.m. local time on Oct. 27, Reuters reported.
Ukraine’s parliamentary human rights commissioner, Dmytro Lubinets, described the sequence Kyiv expects. “Under our agreement: first a ceasefire will be put in place; second, humanitarian aid will be delivered to Oleshky; and third, civilians will be allowed to move freely out of Oleshky,” Mr. Lubinets said, according to DW. “The operation will be carried out gradually and is extremely challenging to implement.”
Mr. Lubinets told Reuters the operation would also include demining.
The Kremlin’s readout used the Russian name for the town. Presidential aide Yuri Ushakov said Russian President Vladimir Putin had thanked Mrs. Trump for her mediation regarding “Alyoshki,” according to the official Kremlin transcript.
The test now is practical. DW, citing monitors from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s human rights office, reported that residents have said they were prevented from leaving the town in the past. Whether people can actually walk out through the safe corridor, and whether aid convoys reach those who stay, will show more than any statement about whether local humanitarian truces can be used elsewhere along the front.
Back to the table — in Abu Dhabi, or Switzerland
The larger diplomatic step came out of the Oct. 21 meeting in St. Petersburg between Mr. Putin and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff. The Kremlin said it was the ninth such meeting and lasted nearly three hours at the Constantine Palace. Jared Kushner joined by video for health reasons, according to Mr. Ushakov.
“Our President informed Steve Witkoff that, in principle, Russia is ready to resume the trilateral talks around the 10th of November to discuss the main issue,” Mr. Ushakov said, according to the Kremlin transcript. “This concerns the establishment of a security system for Russia and Ukraine after the end of the conflict.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has embraced that timeline. “The plan is to meet in the first half of November, and as early as possible, of course,” Mr. Zelenskyy said, according to Reuters. A U.S. official told Reuters the venue would be Abu Dhabi or Switzerland. Mr. Ushakov told Russian state television the talks may be held in Abu Dhabi, Al Jazeera reported.
Mr. Zelenskyy has also tried to keep the most contested issue for the leaders themselves. “Territories is a sensitive issue which can be (addressed) during discussions on the level of leaders,” he said, according to a Reuters report carried by Al-Monitor.
Kyiv’s public position is broad. Mr. Zelenskyy said Ukraine supports “any proposals for a ceasefire, an end to the war, an energy ceasefire as well as humanitarian initiatives,” Al Jazeera reported. Reuters reported that he also wants guaranteed funding for Ukraine’s army for 10 years and binding security guarantees.
Moscow’s framing is different. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov pushed back on European efforts to shape the outcome. “It is clear that the architecture of European security cannot be discussed without other participants,” Mr. Peskov said, according to DW.
The last trilateral round was held in February, before the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran. The Kremlin readout shows how much has changed since then. In the same briefing, Mr. Ushakov called Iran a “strategic partner.” He said a possible meeting of Mr. Putin, President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping at next month’s APEC summit in Shenzhen “has not been rejected by any of the capitals.”
The talks have already produced one concrete exchange: a swap of 270 prisoners of war for 270, which Mr. Zelenskyy called a “very important result,” according to Reuters. Mr. Putin also pardoned an American held in Russia, a man identified in the Kremlin readout as Hubbard.
Pressure on Kyiv, and the Starlink question
The White House has been blunt with Ukraine as well. Mr. Trump said this week, “Zelenskyy has to want to settle this war, and if he doesn’t, I think it’s going to be a very bad thing,” Al Jazeera reported.
“He’s going to have to want to make a deal, because I don’t think his people are going to stand for it any longer,” Mr. Trump said. He said of the two sides: “It’s hard for them to be in the same room … I don’t care how it’s done.”
A quieter pressure point is connectivity. Since Oct. 13, Ukraine has faced speed limits on Starlink and its military counterpart, Starshield. On Oct. 14, SpaceX owner Elon Musk wrote that “Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS,” according to Al Jazeera.
“The speed limits on Starlink and Starshield are still there,” Mr. Zelenskyy said this week, according to Reuters. Asked about the caps, Mr. Trump said, “If there is a problem, I’ll get it straightened out,” Reuters reported. He also said, “Elon will never do anything wrong,” according to DW.
The human cost behind the talks is still rising. Ukrainian prosecutors, cited by Reuters, count more than 19,000 Ukrainian civilians killed since the full-scale invasion, including 762 children. Of those, 2,960 were killed in 2026, including 668 children.
The sanctions waiver behind the diesel
The least visible part of the bargain is written in law, not in statements.
On Sept. 18, Mr. Trump signed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026. The law called for a 500 percent increase in duties on Russian goods. It also called for a 100 percent duty on goods from the five largest importers of Russian oil and gas and on those who help evade the measures, along with a range of new sanctions.
Four weeks later, on Oct. 16, the president signed Executive Order 14436, published in the Federal Register on Oct. 21. It formally sets those duties and then waives them under the law’s national-interest provision.
“I hereby waive the application of any duties provided for in sections 112 and 113 of the Graham Act or this order,” the order states. It also waives the law’s new sanctions and restrictions, and says the president has sent Congress “a certification that the issuance of such a waiver is in the national interests of the United States.” The waiver stays in effect until the president or the secretary of state decides otherwise.
The order does not lift older penalties. It says “nothing in this order affects any sanctions or other measures” imposed under earlier executive orders addressing Russia’s “harmful foreign activities.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the approach in an interview with the Indian broadcaster News18. “The president chose to use a national security waiver to not immediately implement those, because he recognises that these things have to be looked at in their totality,” Mr. Rubio said, according to Al Jazeera. “When you do that pressure, sometimes it spills over and has a negative impact on other countries.”
Kyiv sees it differently. “Sanctions work,” Mr. Zelenskyy said, according to Reuters. “If you put, please put, don’t lift.”
A tanker bound for New York
The clearest commercial result of the shift is now at sea. According to S&P Global Commodity Insights, the Malta-flagged tanker Agioi Fanendes left the Russian Baltic port of Primorsk on Oct. 22 with about 40,000 metric tons of diesel. It is headed for New York and expected to arrive around Nov. 6–7. S&P said it is the first Russian diesel cargo bound for the United States since 2022. The cargo follows an Oct. 9 Treasury Department waiver covering Russian-origin diesel, S&P reported.
“The first tanker has, in fact, set off toward its destinations — to its buyers — and [subsequent shipments] will continue on a regular basis,” Mr. Peskov told the Russian news agency TASS, according to S&P. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak has given export targets of 300,000 metric tons in October, 500,000 in November and 1 million in December, S&P reported.
Moscow presents this as good business for both sides. In the Kremlin readout, Mr. Ushakov said the diesel arrangement “serves the interests of both the United States and Russia, while also helping to stabilise supply and demand in the global fuel market.”
The market Washington is trying to calm is very tight. S&P put European diesel at $1,479 per metric ton on Oct. 22, more than double the $714.72 it recorded in February. Ukraine’s last reported strike on a Russian refinery was Oct. 15, S&P said.
What it means at the pump in Western New York
Buffalo drivers and truckers have felt that squeeze. New York State’s weekly retail diesel price data put the average price of diesel in the Buffalo region at $6.38 a gallon for the week of Oct. 5. A gallon cost $3.92 in the week of Feb. 23. The statewide average was $6.52.
The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority’s weekly on-highway diesel figures, which cover a composite region of New York and neighboring mid-Atlantic states, put the price at $6.47 a gallon for the week of Oct. 12, up 66.9 percent from $3.88 a year earlier.
That cost runs through the region’s economy. It hits the trucking companies along the Thruway and the Peace Bridge corridor, the contractors pricing out spring construction bids, and the developers whose projects depend on concrete, steel and heavy equipment that run on diesel. A single 40,000-ton cargo is small next to the U.S. market, and how quickly any Russian supply reaches retail prices is unclear. But the administration’s argument rests on a simple point: more barrels on the water should, over time, ease the distillate shortage behind those prices.
The risk is that the arrangement can be reversed in either direction. The waiver can be revoked by the president or the secretary of state. Congress, which passed the Graham Act, can push back. And if the November talks stall, Kyiv has shown it can reach Russian refineries.
What to watch
Three dates matter in the next three weeks.
The first is Tuesday, Oct. 27, when the Oleshky pause begins. It will show whether a localized, civilian-run humanitarian truce can work, with aid inside, evacuees out and no fire on the corridor.
The second is the trilateral meeting, which the Kremlin placed around Nov. 10. Mr. Ushakov described its subject as a postwar “security system for Russia and Ukraine.” Mr. Zelenskyy wants territory left to the leaders. How the agenda is written will signal which side’s framing has prevailed.
The third is the arrival of the Agioi Fanendes in New York harbor around Nov. 6–7. It will be the first physical delivery of a policy that, on paper, still sits under a law calling for steep penalties on trade with Russia.
The White House press office, which also handles inquiries for the Office of the First Lady, was asked for comment on the ceasefire’s implementation and the status of the Graham Act waiver. The Buffalo Chronicle is also seeking comment from the State Department and the Embassy of Ukraine. Any responses will be added to this story.
Leave a Reply