ALBANY — Gov. Kathy Hochul does not, her aides insist, want to make Nassau County the sixth borough of New York City. She has said so in different words for three years: that a housing target is not a rezoning, that a toll is not an annexation, that a ban on local immigration agreements is not a plot to import the politics of Queens into Garden City.
Almost no one in Nassau believes her. The disbelief has become the organizing premise of the fall campaign, and of the race between Ms. Hochul and the man who has spent those same three years treating the county line as a border under siege: Bruce Blakeman, the Republican county executive now running to replace her.
A Marist poll released Wednesday found Ms. Hochul leading Mr. Blakeman by 11 points among registered voters, 53 percent to 42 percent. The lead is a city lead. In New York City she was ahead 69 to 24. Upstate, Mr. Blakeman led. In the suburbs the two were tied. Nassau, in other words, is not a rounding error. It is the argument.
The argument is older than either candidate. Long Island has spent a century defining itself against the city it feeds — by train in the morning, by tax bill in April, by headline whenever a mayor proposes something that will be paid for east of the city line. What has changed is the precision of the complaint. “Sixth borough” used to be a joke about the Hamptons in August. In Mineola it is now a theory of government.
The exhibits are familiar, and Ms. Hochul’s opponents recite them in order.
In 2023 she proposed to override local zoning in the downstate suburbs and require denser housing near transit, a plan local officials described, without much exaggeration of their own fears, as an attempt to urbanize towns that had incorporated in order not to be urban. Jennifer DeSena, the North Hempstead supervisor, said the proposals would turn “our neighborhoods into overcrowded urban centers.”
Joseph Saladino, of Oyster Bay, said the region had to “fight to keep single-family neighborhoods intact.”
The mandate died. The memory did not. Three years later, downstate counties around the five boroughs still account for a thin share of the localities that have joined her voluntary pro-housing program, though they hold about a fifth of the state’s population.
Then came congestion pricing. Ms. Hochul paused it in an election year, citing the fragile city economy and the fury of suburban drivers, and revived it after the votes were cast. Nassau legislators still call it a commuter tax levied to rescue the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. To a homeowner in Massapequa, the sequence did not read as caution. It read as a tell.
This year the tell, in Mr. Blakeman’s telling, was immigration. Nassau had signed 287(g) agreements allowing county police and the sheriff’s office to work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In May, Ms. Hochul signed the Local Cops, Local Crimes Act, banning such agreements. In July she and Attorney General Letitia James warned Nassau to unwind them. “We will not tolerate the diversion of local resources for federal civil immigration enforcement at the expense of public safety,” she said.
Mr. Blakeman’s reply was less bureaucratic: “Kathy Hochul is hell-bent on making the communities of New York State less safe,” he said. On the trail this week he promised that on his first day as governor he would declare that New York “is no longer a sanctuary state.”
None of this is a proposal to redraw the city map. There is no bill to absorb Hempstead. The denial is literally true, which is why it is politically useless. Voters arguing about a sixth borough are not arguing about charter revision. They are arguing about whether the governing instincts of the city — on density, on policing, on who pays for the trains — now operate statewide by default, with the suburbs consulted mainly as a source of revenue and a reservoir of electoral risk.
Ms. Hochul’s case against that reading is not nothing. She is from Hamburg, outside Buffalo, not from Park Slope. She froze congestion pricing when the suburbs revolted, and she has spent the fall trying to separate herself from the left of her own party even as she campaigns alongside figures Mr. Blakeman lumps in with Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Her allies note that Mr. Blakeman complied with the immigration law even while promising a lawsuit, and that a month later Nassau still had not joined the sheriffs’ suit against it. They also note the poll. An 11-point lead is not the profile of a governor who has forfeited the state outside the five boroughs.
The trouble is sequence. Each denial arrives after the policy, and each policy lands on the same towns. A governor can be personally suburban and still govern as if the political center of the state were the Manhattan Democratic Primary. Nassau voters have decided, with some evidence, that this is the more relevant fact.
Mr. Blakeman has every incentive to keep the metaphor alive. He cannot win the city. He can win by convincing the rest of the state that a vote for Ms. Hochul is a vote to be administered from it. The sixth-borough line does that work in a sentence. It converts a zoning fight, a toll, and an immigration statute into a single loss of status: not a neighbor of the city, a jurisdiction of it.
Whether the line is fair is almost beside the point. It is believed. And in Nassau, belief has been the more durable fact of the Hochul years — more durable than the housing bill that failed, more durable than the pause that did not hold, more durable than the assurance, offered again this fall, that none of it was ever about them.
Be the first to comment