Supporters want Poloncarz to return $37,000 in Paladino contributions

The Public Accountability Initiative has published that developer Carl Paladino’s top ten contributors are all white men, which has unsettled many voters who find his racially divisive and homophobic comments deeply troubling and incongruent with the modern and diverse city that younger Buffalonians are building. But to almost everyone’s surprise, the second largest recipient of Paladino’s money has been County Executive Mark Poloncarz — to the tune of $37,000. Poloncarz’s supporters are outraged.

The first term county executive claims that he is a proud liberal, far to the left of other Democrats. In fact, his little known Republican opponent has publicly stated his intention to use video footage of Poloncarz vocalizing how liberal he is on Time Warner’s Capitol Pressroom with Liz Benjamin. In the interview, he comments that he gets along better with downstate leftists rather than with locals. But that liberal image may now be badly tarnished in light of the — seemingly copious — sums of Paladino cash.

Even his most loyal supporters are asking, “what’s Carl getting for that kind of money?” Poloncarz is a divorcee whose wife enjoys talking. After his marriage ended badly, he had a series of relatively public relationships. A particular relationship with a campaign worker has raised eyebrows.

Most moderates and conservatives don’t see much controversy in the Paladino cash. But liberals have become deeply suspicious of the relationship between the two men.

Why would Paladino, who is known for his racist antics and divisive style, support someone who espouses the opposite social values, they ask. Is there congruence in some shared policy agenda? The answer to that question could shake Poloncarz’s reelection prospects — but only if the long shot Republican challenger is willing to attack from the left. As of yet, that remains unlikely. The Public Accountability Initiative reports that Paladino has received $13.8 million in tax subsidies since 2003 alone.

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Is there a chance…just a chance that you might ever quote even one source by name? Just one. When your headlines scream conclusions about candidates and public officials in declarative terms, it’s always lost in the story that you never, ever quote a named source. This story is complete fabricated nonsense.

    Like

    • The unfortunate truth of the matter is that our vicious political culture prevents operatives, government workers, contractors, and others from going on the record publicly for fear of political retribution and monetary harm. My willingness to shield them is what makes them willing to talk to me and to give me information. When something is unconfirmed, I state it is as such; and I’m careful not to overstate rumor as fact.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s